up

hi, i have a little problem with a new contaier... i have create a new image of a recipient and with mulpatcher i hav put it in the first free gump slot (27). so i have set in tiledata the flag "container" and i have saved. in itemdesc i have create the container. When i double click in th...

if i change the maxX, ecc of the normal gump, nothing change.

what manage the limit of the gump?

please help me

anyone know that? it's a big problem for me

help me please

mh i think it's an hardcoded function, but i'm not sure...

hi, i have a little problem with a new contaier... i have create a new image of a recipient and with mulpatcher i hav put it in the first free gump slot (27). so i have set in tiledata the flag "container" and i have saved. in itemdesc i have create the container. When i double click in th...

anyone know how do that?

hi, i have a question for all developer... there is a way to call via scripts the spells icon? because i have a custom spellbook but there isn't any icons. If i'll put it, i'll hook the spells/macro packet.. but if i call the number of gump of the icon, the icon appear but it not work with the click...

what do you mean?

The current 097-release is, aside some bugs (check its bug report forum), working great. I cannot say for sure of its memory consuming habits comparing to older cores, but I doubt its as noticeable as yours case 096 was. Why wouldn't you try to convert into and tell the results? yes i think i'll do...

thank you

do you know if pol 097 cost minor RAM respect pol 096?

it's reliable?


thank again and sorry for the all question

thank you for the fast reply.

Then, you call me that pol096 cost more memory ram at difference of the pol 095?

note that i see the big usage immediately when the pol il launched and not when the script are long running; and i have built only the britannia realm


thank you again

Hi, i am an italian developer and i've a little question for you. I've converted my custom pol 095 to pol 096 and i've noticed that with the same scripts, with the same Data, my Ram cost are passed from 25% (of 256 mb) to 55% . It's normal or there's a problem? (the scripts are equal !). Thank you a...