Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 1094 Location: Southern Central USA
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:56 am Post subject: Which uoclient.cfg file is relevant?
According to pol.cfg "Port and encryption settings now handled in UOCLIENT.CFG". However there exist two instances of that file; one in \Distro_POL_96\096\pkg\config and another in \Distro_POL_96\096\pkg\systems\attributes
I will no doubt figure it out by trial and error but it would be nice if the changelog told us which one to use and hopefully in the next distro update the unused one will be removed from the Tortoise server download.
Thanks.
Re: Which uoclient.cfg file is relevant?
Author
Message
Shinigami POL Core Developer
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 292 Location: Germany, Bavaria
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:26 am Post subject: Re: Which uoclient.cfg file is relevant?
Yukiko wrote:
However there exist two instances of that file; one in \Distro_POL_96\096\pkg\config and another in \Distro_POL_96\096\pkg\systems\attributes
the Core will load both files and use each entry inside both files... but it's hard to say which one first and which one last - depends on your file system
Shinigami
Author
Message
Yukiko
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 1094 Location: Southern Central USA
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:38 pm Post subject:
Any plans to eliminate the redundancy there Shini?
Seems having just one instance of the uoclient.cfg file would be better.
Author
Message
Shinigami POL Core Developer
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 292 Location: Germany, Bavaria
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:25 am Post subject:
from Core side... hmm... why?
from Distro side... don't know... I've nothing to do with Distro
Shinigami
Author
Message
Yukiko
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 1094 Location: Southern Central USA
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:42 am Post subject:
Well, having two seperate cfg files mifght get confusing don't you think? I mean if you make changes to one you have to make changes to both. I can imagine it causing errors or glitches if you forget to change one.
